Skip to content
Research & Publications

Research & Publications

Legume inoculants: research and field records.

Product-specific research for Nodu, Vigor and Orvan. Findings refer to the named product, crop and trial conditions.

Evidence by technology

Each of our three technologies is validated in its own multi-site field program. Orvan™ carries the deepest dataset; Nodu™ and Vigor™ are validated across hundreds of sites in their own right.

Orvan™ field data — all eight legumes

Our deepest dataset, by crop. Nodu™ and Vigor™ field data are summarized on each technology page.

CropAvg. yieldNodulesNitrogenaseN fixed / otherSites
Peanut+19.9%up to 8.5×up to 10.7×>80% soil A. flavus ↓405 / 19 prov.
Soybean+16.1%up to 3.7×up to 4.8×+ isoflavone253 / 18 prov.
Common bean+14.2%up to 4.6×up to 5.0×≤60 kg N/ha62 / 6 prov.
Cowpea+13.8%up to 5.2×up to 4.4×≤115 kg N/ha48 / 5 prov.
Pigeon pea+12.6%up to 4.1×up to 3.8×≤140 kg N/ha36 / 4 prov.
Mung bean+15.3%up to 4.8×up to 4.5×≤55 kg N/ha54 / 5 prov.
Black gram+11.9%up to 4.3×38–41/plant≤55 kg N/ha30 / 4 prov.
Alfalfa+15.2%up to 6.1×up to 5.6×150–250+ kg N/yr96 / 4 reg.

In dedicated trials over three consecutive years, Orvan™-treated fields held a >10% yield gain even with 20–40% less synthetic nitrogen.

Where the upside is largest: these multi-site results were measured in mature, long-cultivated regions where effective native rhizobia are already common. Response to inoculation is typically greater on first-time legume ground and on saline-alkali, acid, low-fertility, or degraded soils — where compatible rhizobia are sparse and the soil is more limiting — so these figures are best read as a conservative baseline.

Results disclaimer: performance data were collected by OCRI-CAAS and partners in field or laboratory studies. Variables — soil, climate, crop variety, and management — affect performance; results may vary and should be validated through local trials.

A demonstration site under assessment. Treated and untreated strips sit side by side, marked plot by plot.
Regional review. Field data read back against the crop and the region it came from before any figure is published.

How we run and report trials

A yield figure is only worth the protocol behind it. This is how the numbers on this page were produced, and what each of them does and does not mean.

Who runs them

The core programs are run by OCRI-CAAS and by partner institutes and provincial extension stations, on their own sites and under their own measurement. Demonstration harvests are measured on site by an expert panel convened for the purpose, not by us.

What is compared

Every figure is a treated plot against an untreated control on the same field, in the same season, with the same variety, sowing date and management. The only deliberate difference is the inoculant. Where a product is quoted on its own — Nodu™ or Vigor™ standalone yield — it was applied without the other two.

What the numbers mean

Yield percentages are the mean across all sites in that crop’s program, not the best site. Fold-changes written “up to” are the opposite: the highest response observed, which is why they sit well above the average and should be read as the ceiling rather than the expectation. Site and province counts are cumulative across seasons.

What we do not claim

On peanut we measured Aspergillus flavus in the soil, so that is what we report. We do not state a reduction in aflatoxin in the kernel, and no figure on this site should be read that way. Whether the lower soil counts and the stronger symbiosis are causally linked is still being worked out.

What you can ask for

Per-site data, protocols and the underlying reports are available to qualified partners under NDA, and we would rather you validated the biology on your own ground than took a Chinese mean on trust. We help set up and read a local trial as part of any serious evaluation.

Publications

  • Peer-reviewed studies on rhizobial inoculation and legume yield response.
  • Peer-reviewed research on microbial coupling and nodulation enhancement.
  • Full citations and complete data packages shared with qualified partners under NDA.

Recognition

  • 2019 — First registered as a microbial fertilizer (MARA)
  • 2023 — National Recommended Agricultural Technology & Agricultural Spark Technology
  • 2024 — One of China's Top 10 Major Leading Agricultural Technologies (MARA)

Research collaborations

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)
Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Kansas State University
University of California, Davis
University of California, Riverside
Arizona State University
University of Florida

From the field

Representative demonstrations across legumes and provinces.

Peanut — Liaoning, 2024

Whole-plant comparison: Orvan™-treated plots showed denser pods and abundant pink nodulation versus untreated control (CK); part of the 325-site program.

Soybean — Heilongjiang, 2023

Stronger Bradyrhizobium nodulation and higher yield with Nodu™ SY + Orvan™.

Common bean — Yunnan, 2022

On low-nitrogen hill soils, the largest relative nodulation and yield response.

Mung bean — Jilin, 2023

Fast early nodulation matched to the short cycle.

Alfalfa — Gansu, 2024

Sinorhizobium meliloti inoculation lifted nodulation and stand establishment on alkaline soil, with higher hay yield and crude protein.

More named grower and regional cases are published as the program expands.

Want the full data package?

Peer-reviewed publications are public; full data packages are available to qualified partners under NDA.